A determination of the sensitivity of the AAnalyst 100 in emission and absorption mode. Examining the accuracy reproducibility of the AAnalyst 100 for the Na and K ions.

Class: BE210
Group: W2
Members:      FACILITATOR……………………….... Lauren Doyle

                        TIME KEEPER……………………….. Naila Machado

                        TASK KEEPER…………………………….. Navy Ros

                        SCRIBE…………………………………… Kipum Lee

                        PRESENTER……………..………….... Marcus Frohm

Date: May, 2001

Full Text

Abstract:
The AAnalyst 100 (AA100) can be used as an absorption spectrometer or a flame emission spectrometer without lamps, in which the instrument measures ion concentrations based on the light emitted upon vaporizing a sample in the flame. This project involved learning to use the AA100 in the emission mode, and determining its sensitivity (precision and accuracy), in absorption and emission mode for K and Na.  The emission sensitivities for Na and K were compared with absorption sensitivities and it was determined that there is no significant difference in sensitivities.  For K in absorption mode, the standard percent deviations for the two test sample trials were ± 4.01% and ± 3.40%, and in the emission mode, ± 1.41% and ± 0.92%.  For Na in the absorption mode, the standard percent deviations for the two test sample trials were ± 3.83% and ± 3.09%, but values were not found in the emission mode because no linear range was found.  For K in the absorption mode, the percent error for the two test sample trials were –2.71% and 4.00%, and in the emission mode, the percent errors were 3.00% and 3.55%.  For Na in the absorption mode, the percent error for the two test sample trials were –2.00% and 3.71%, but percent error values were not found in the emission mode because no linear range was found.  Since there were no standard percent deviation and percent error values determined for Na in the emission mode, comparisons of absorption and emission must be solely based on the tests done for K.  The standard percent deviations and percent errors calculated for K showed that there was no significant difference between absorption and emission mode at the 95% confidence intervals for the respective linear ranges of concentration. The principal accomplishment of this experiment was finding the optimal settings for K and Na in the emission mode.  Knowing the optimal settings allows the user a great deal of versatility with the AA100 in emission mode.  The optimal setting for the nebulizer was determined to be 1 turn for both K and Na in emission mode.  The optimal settings for K for the vertical adjustment knob, horizontal adjustment knob and fuel-to-oxidant ratio were determined to be 12.5 clockwise turns, 4 clockwise turns, and 2.25, respectively.  The optimal settings for Na for the vertical adjustment knob, horizontal adjustment knob and fuel-to-oxidant ratio were determined to be 15 clockwise turns, 2.75 clockwise turns and 2, respectively.  All values in the emission mode linear testing were recorded with the machine at the optimal settings.