Class: BE210
Group: R4
Members:
FACILITATOR……………………….. Neeta Shah
TIME & TASK KEEPER……………… André Ilbawi
SCRIBE……………………………….. Tracy Yuen
PRESENTER…………………………. Joshua Doloff
Date: May, 2002
Abstract:
The main objective of this experiment was to quantitatively determine
which temperature device among a manually-read mercury thermometer, electronic
Labview I (DMM) thermometer, or Labview II (“Bomb2”) thermometer
was most precise and accurate in finding the gross heat of combustion of
high purity benzoic acid using the 1341 Parr bomb calorimeter. This
was achieved through extensive calibration, statistical analysis of past
lab reports, and determination of the heat of combustion values of benzoic
acid and the W factor for each calorimeter. Although all the devices
yielded results with confidence intervals that included the accepted literature
value of 6318 ± 1.0 cal/g, the manually-read mercury thermometer
was found to be the most accurate and precise as seen by the -0.153 % percent
error and a precision of ± 26. cal/g (0.41 % error), respectively.
It was followed by the Labview II thermometer, which had a 0.885 % error
with a precision of ± 57 cal/g (0.90% error), and lastly the Labview
I with a percent error of 1.651 % and precision of ±118 cal/g (1.83
% error). The W factors found for the mercury thermometer, Labview
I, and Labview II were 2430. cal/ oC ± 10 % (95% Confidence Interval),
2405. cal/ oC ± 25%, and 2387. cal/oC ± 44%, respectively.
These findings were confirmed using the experimentally determined W factors
and recalculating the precision of the thermometers. Although the mercury
thermometer was found to be the most precise and accurate, considering
ease of function, the Labview II is the most efficient yet still within
the range of allowable accuracy and precision.